NICKNAMES IN TEENAGERS

  • Atik Khoiroti Universitas Kanjuruhan Malang
  • Rahutami Rahutami
  • Suryantoro Suryantoro
Keywords: nicknames, adolescents, forms of nicknames, referents of nickmanes, adolescent

Abstract

This study aims to describe the use of the form and referent nicknames of adolescents. The nickname indicated the freedom of language that comes from adolescents identity. The method of this study is descriptive qualitative method of nicknames used by participants as research data. The participants are teenage students. Data collected using questionnaire technique and analysis technique used pragmatic matching technique to analyze the form of nicknames and the referential matching technique to analyze the nickname referent. The results showed that the various forms of nicknames included the use of likenesses, mention of distinctive traits, events, names of parents, occupations, likes and negations. Relative nicknames use harsh vocabulary and referents are negative / bad. The use of nicknames among adolescents as a form of expression of feelings (intimacy) adolescents towards others. This familiarity is manifested in the use of harsh and negative nicknames, but there is no problem or offense for the subject.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmadi, D., dan A. Nuraini. (2005). Teori Penjulukan. Mediator: Jurnal Komunikasi, 6(2), 297–306. https://doi.org/10.29313/mediator.v6i2.1209
Amriati, Y. (2016). Jenis makna dan penamaan nama panggilan unik mahasiswa program studi pendidikan bahasa dan sastra Indonesia Universitas muhammadiyah Purwokerto tahun 2015-2016. Skripsi. Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto.
Chaer, A. (2013). Pengantar Semantik Bahasa Indonesia (hlm. 43-64). Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Djajasudarma, T. F. (2009a). Semantik 1: Makna Leksikal dan Gramatikal (hlm. 30). Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Djajasudarma, T. F. (2009b). Semantik 2- Pemahaman Ilmu Makna (hlm. 14). Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Jahdiah. (2018). Nama Galaran (Julukan) pada Masyarakat Banjar di Kampung Mandi Kapau Kecamatan Karang Intan. Undas, 14(2), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.26499/und.v14i2.1144
Kesuma, T. M. (2007). Pengantar (Metode) Penelitian Bahasa (hlm. 53). Yogyakarta: Carasvatiooks.
Lubis, A. H. H. (2011). Analisis Wacana Pragmatik (revisi) (hlm. 32). Bandung: Percetakan Angkasa.
Pramita, D. D., E. Ermanto., dan N. Juita. (2017). Sistem Nama Diri Masyarakat Etnis Minangkabau: Kajian Nama Panggilan Pada Masyarakat Rantau Pasisia Di Pariaman. Bahasa dan Sastra, 4(2), 38–46. http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/ibs/article/view/10052
Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan Secara Linguistik (hlm. 35). Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma Universit Press.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (hlm. 142). Bandung: Alfabeta,cv.
Sumarsono. (2010). Pragmatik (hlm. 150). Singaraja: Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.
Wijana, I. D. P., dan M. Rohmadi. (2012). Sosiolinguistik: kajian teori dan analisis (hlm. 24-123). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Yule, G. (2014). Pragmatik (II) (hlm. 14). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Published
2021-06-24
How to Cite
Khoiroti, A., Rahutami, R., & Suryantoro, S. (2021). NICKNAMES IN TEENAGERS. Gramatika: Jurnal Ilmiah Kebahasaan Dan Kesastraan, 9(1), 37-51. Retrieved from http://gramatika.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php/gramatika/article/view/350